CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1963 Norwegian Second Division

football league season

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 24, 2025
Entity authorityQ11956213 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 1963 2. divisjon was the first Norwegian national second-tier football league season.

The league was contested by 16 teams, divided into two groups; A and B. The winners of group A and B were promoted to the 1964 1. divisjon. The two lowest placed teams in both groups were relegated to the 3. divisjon.

Overview

Summary

Sandefjord BK won group A with 24 points. Raufoss won group B with 21 points. Both teams were promoted to the 1964 1. divisjon.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “1963 Norwegian Second Division” is football league season. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Norwegian, Second and Division, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1963, 1964—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Norwegian, Second and Division is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “football league season” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 24, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q11956213. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1963 and 1964.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1963 Norwegian Second Division”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1963 Norwegian Second Division primary sources, 1963 Norwegian Second Division archive and Norwegian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1963 Norwegian Second Division”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1963 Norwegian Second Division” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.