CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ulchi-Freedom Guardian

annual combined military exercise between South Korea and the United States

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ498182
Source-derived summary

Ulchi-Freedom Guardian (을지 프리덤 가디언, Eulji peurideom gadieon) is the name (as of 2015) of the military exercise previously known as Ulchi-Focus Lens, a combined military exercise between South Korea and the United States. The exercise is the world's largest computerized command and control implementation, involving 50,000 South Korean troops alongside 17,500 U.S. troops in 2017, and mainly focuses on defending South Korea from a North Korean attack. The exercise was initiated in 1976 and is conducted annually during August or September. The word 'Ulchi' comes from the name of a famous Korean general called Ŭlchi Mundŏk, who was the Commander-In-Chief of the army of Goguryeo.

History

The origin of the exercise is Taeguk Yeonseup (태극연습, Taeguk Exercise), which began after the Blue House Raid by North Korean special forces in 1968. The title of the exercise was changed to Ulchi Yeonseup (을지연습, Ulchi Exercise) in the following year. In 1976, it was integrated with ROK-US Combined Forces Command's military training, Focus Lens, into Ulchi-Focus Lens. The name of the exercise was changed again in 2008 to Ulchi-Freedom Guardian.

The exercise has on occasion included contingents from Australia, Britain, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, the Netherlands and New Zealand.

In 2022, thousands of protesters demonstrated against the drills in South Korea.

Editorial summary

“Ulchi-Freedom Guardian” enters the record as annual combined military exercise between South Korea and the United States. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ulchi-Freedom, Guardian and annual can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2017, 1976, 1968—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1976. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ulchi-Freedom, Guardian and annual.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ulchi-Freedom Guardian” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ulchi-Freedom, Guardian and annual provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q498182. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2017, 1976 and 1968.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ulchi-Freedom Guardian”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ulchi-Freedom Guardian primary sources, Ulchi-Freedom Guardian archive and Ulchi-Freedom research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ulchi-Freedom Guardian”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ulchi-Freedom Guardian” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.