CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1867 City of Auckland West by-election

New Zealand by-election

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ60543021 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 1867 City of Auckland West by-election was a by-election held on 25 April 1867 in the City of Auckland West electorate during the 4th New Zealand Parliament. It was then a two-member electorate.

The by-election was caused by the resignation of the incumbent, James Williamson.

Patrick Dignan was nominated, and as there were no other nominations he was declared elected unopposed.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “1867 City of Auckland West by-election” as new Zealand by-election. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around City, Auckland and West.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1867—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with City, Auckland and West providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “1867 City of Auckland West by-election”, the useful work is to connect “new Zealand by-election” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60543021. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1867.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1867 City of Auckland West by-election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1867 City of Auckland West by-election primary sources, 1867 City of Auckland West by-election archive and City research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1867 City of Auckland West by-election”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1867 City of Auckland West by-election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.