CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1813 in science

overview of natural science-related events during the year of 1813

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 15, 2024
Entity authorityQ261292
Source-derived summary

The year 1813 in science and technology involved some significant events, listed below.

Biology

April – William Charles Wells reads a paper to the Royal Society of London making the first clear statement about natural selection.

Charles Waterton begins the process of turning his estate at Walton Hall, West Yorkshire, England, into what is, in effect, the world's first nature reserve.

Chemistry

Mathieu Orfila publishes his groundbreaking Traité des poisons, formalizing the field of toxicology.

Louis Jacques Thénard commences publication of his textbook Traité de chimie élémentaire, théorique et pratique in Paris.

Edward Howard invents the enclosed vacuum pan for refining sugar.

Exploration

May 11 – Gregory Blaxland, William Lawson and William Wentworth leave on an expedition to cross the Blue Mountains (New South Wales).

Mathematics

S. D. Poisson publishes Poisson's equation, his correction of Laplace's second order partial differential equation for potential.

Medicine

English physician Thomas Tutton publishes Tracts on Delirium Tremens, on Peritonitis, and on Some other Internal Inflammatory Affections, and on the Gout in London, providing case studies of delirium tremens.

Physics

British engineer Peter Ewart supports the idea of the conservation of energy in his paper "On the measure of moving force".

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “1813 in science” as overview of natural science-related events during the year of 1813. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1813—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where science, overview and natural can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as overview of natural science-related events during the year of 1813. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 15, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q261292. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1813.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1813 in science”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1813 in science primary sources, 1813 in science archive and science research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1813 in science”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from 1813 in science” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.