CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

15th Chunwon

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2022
Entity authorityQ4550947 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 15th Chunwon began on 15 June 2010 and concluded on 27 January 2011. Defending champion Park Junghwan progressed past the first round, but his title defense was halted after losing to Yun Junsang in the second round. Choi Cheol-han was the eventual winner, winning the Chunwon for the third time in his career.

Editorial summary

“15th Chunwon” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what 15th, Chunwon and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around 15th, Chunwon and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“15th Chunwon” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, 15th, Chunwon and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q4550947. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 2011.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “15th Chunwon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 15th Chunwon primary sources, 15th Chunwon archive and 15th research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “15th Chunwon”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “15th Chunwon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.