CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

11th Seiyu Awards

award ceremony presented by the Seiyu Awards Executive Committee for achievement in voice acting in Japan in 2017

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ29831183 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 11th Seiyu Awards was held on March 18, 2017, at the JOQR Media Plus Hall in Minato, Tokyo. The winners of the Merit Awards, the Kei Tomiyama Award and the Kazue Takahashi Award were announced on February 21, 2017. The winners of the Synergy Award and Kids/Family award was announced on March 14, 2017. The rest of the winners were announced on the ceremony day.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “11th Seiyu Awards” as award ceremony presented by the Seiyu Awards Executive Committee for achievement in voice acting in Japan in 2017. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where 11th, Seiyu and Awards can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as award ceremony presented by the Seiyu Awards Executive Committee for achievement in voice acting in Japan in 2017. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q29831183. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “11th Seiyu Awards”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 11th Seiyu Awards primary sources, 11th Seiyu Awards archive and 11th research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “11th Seiyu Awards”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “11th Seiyu Awards” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.