CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

10 Foot

Graffiti writer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ137723353
Source-derived summary

10 Foot is the tag of a pseudonymous London-based graffiti writer. He has been described by the Financial Times as the city's most prolific, and one of the most productive globally.

Legal issues

On 18 November 2010, 10 Foot was convicted of being guilty of 25 counts of criminal damage totalling up to an estimated £113,000. He was subsequently jailed for 24 months, and handed a 5-year ASBO.

Tagging

Many 10 Foot tags notably appear in central London, alongside famous landmarks. 10 Foot is known for tagging locations which are difficult to access. Despite his notoriety in London, his work is also known to be in 53 cities worldwide.

10 Foot guest edited the 17 March 2025 issue of The Big Issue.

Editorial summary

“10 Foot” enters the record as graffiti writer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Foot, Graffiti and writer can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Foot, Graffiti and writer.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“10 Foot” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Foot, Graffiti and writer provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q137723353. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 2025.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “10 Foot”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 10 Foot primary sources, 10 Foot archive and Foot research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “10 Foot”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from 10 Foot” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.