(83) FOR-TRUTH
Open-knowledge reference entry

(83) FOR-TRUTH is an American Christian billboard evangelism campaign operated by Christian Aid Ministries (CAM). The campaign uses roadside billboards and a toll-free phone number, 83-FOR-TRUTH, to direct callers to religious resources, recorded audio, and biblical answers to questions about Christianity.
The campaign is also called Gospel Billboards. CAM says the program began in November 2006 and is intended to make people “stop and think about God, their relationship with Him, and eternity”.
History
Christian Aid Ministries says its billboard evangelism program began in November 2006. The organization says it has posted thousands of gospel messages across the United States and that the campaign receives phone calls from people seeking religious help or information.
Campaign format
The billboards typically use short questions or statements rather than long messages. Examples on the campaign’s website include “Is there evidence for God?”, “Where is your allegiance?”, “Is evolution a myth?”, and “Have you considered eternity?”
CAM says the billboards are intended to prompt reflection and direct interested people to further resources through its website and toll-free number.
Reception
Positive views
Supporters say the campaign gives people a simple way to encounter Christian messages in public spaces and to seek follow-up resources. CAM says thousands of people call the toll-free number and that the campaign logged more than 77,000 calls in 2024.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “(83) FOR-TRUTH” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through FOR-TRUTH, Open-knowledge and entry, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 16, 2026. The first chronological checks are 2006 and 2024.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “(83) FOR-TRUTH”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow (83) FOR-TRUTH primary sources, (83) FOR-TRUTH archive and FOR-TRUTH research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “(83) FOR-TRUTH”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “(83) FOR-TRUTH” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.